High PDD compared with Cisco
Page 1 of 1
High PDD compared with Cisco
by antonio Fri Oct 02, 2020 2:26 pm
Dear All,
I'm using FreeSBC as a Sip Proxy between ITSP and Internal network. I have in the same network Cisco 2951 acting as Sip Proxy also, and I'm testing Freesbc to replace it.During the tests, we noticed that PDD in the FreeSBC is higher than Cisco. I tried to fix it, without success. Does anyone know what the problem may be?
I'm using FreeSBC as a Sip Proxy between ITSP and Internal network. I have in the same network Cisco 2951 acting as Sip Proxy also, and I'm testing Freesbc to replace it.During the tests, we noticed that PDD in the FreeSBC is higher than Cisco. I tried to fix it, without success. Does anyone know what the problem may be?
antonio- Number of Messages : 2
Point : 4
Registration Date : 2020-09-29
Re: High PDD compared with Cisco
by antonio Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:47 pm
I found the problem, and there isn´t in the FreeSBC. The problem was on softswitch side, that was not recognizing SIP 183 as alerting.
antonio- Number of Messages : 2
Point : 4
Registration Date : 2020-09-29
Similar topics» How to configure HA (High Availability) or 1+1 for ProSBC?
» FreeSBC VM High CPU usage and Scheduling problem alarm
» Trunk to Cisco CUBE is down
» integrating freesbc with cisco sip trunk (CUBE)
» Cisco CUBE call hold and resume issue
» FreeSBC VM High CPU usage and Scheduling problem alarm
» Trunk to Cisco CUBE is down
» integrating freesbc with cisco sip trunk (CUBE)
» Cisco CUBE call hold and resume issue
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum